Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiemo De Bakker vs Felix Corwin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bakker vs Corwin analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiemo De Bakker vs Felix Corwin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bakker 0 - 0 Corwin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakker has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Corwin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakker, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Corwin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bakker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Corwin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bakker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Corwin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of while Corwin has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Corwin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Corwin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Thiemo De Bakker vs Felix Corwin For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bakker VS Corwin
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Felix Corwin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Felix Corwin
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
87)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Felix Corwin
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Samuel Nicholson
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seita Watanabe
Player
Felix Corwin
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Felix Corwin
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
108
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 6-7(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Jacob Brumm
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ezequiel Simonit
51%
(
59 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
45%
(
25 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(3) 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ivan Denisov
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Bakker Vs Corwin Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bakker are available here and Corwin photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
